REC / 01Cycle time
- Evidence
- Workflow timestamps
- Operation
- Compare to baseline
- Control
- Owner explanation
- Result
- Speed evidence
How value is calculated, not claimed
Value Model
The value model defines how benefit is measured rather than asserting a return figure: decision cycle time, repeated rework, cost of accepted deviations, senior capacity released and the quality of the delivered outcome. Each measure requires a documented baseline before assistance is introduced.
At a glance
What each figure means- Baseline
- Required first
- Primary measure
- Cycle time
- Quality measure
- Held-back cases
- Published ROI
- None yet
No value claim without a pre-measurement
Intake to approved recommendation
Scored against expert adjudication
No savings percentage is asserted
Evidence ledger
What enters, what changes, what stays accountable.
No field becomes anonymous during extraction, reasoning, approval or return to project memory.
REC / 02Quality
- Evidence
- Held-back cases
- Operation
- Expert adjudication
- Control
- Qualified reviewers
- Result
- Reliability evidence
REC / 03Rework
- Evidence
- Correction records
- Operation
- Frequency and cost
- Control
- Management review
- Result
- Avoidable-cost case
REC / 04Capacity
- Evidence
- Senior review effort
- Operation
- Aggregate reallocation
- Control
- Role-level reporting
- Result
- Capacity evidence
A baseline is not optional
Improvement cannot be claimed without a starting measurement.
Before assistance is introduced, the current cycle time, rework frequency and deviation handling are recorded. Without that baseline, any later improvement claim is unverifiable.
Quality outranks speed
Faster wrong answers destroy value.
Assistance is scored on held-back historical cases adjudicated by qualified experts. A speed gain that reduces decision quality is treated as a failure, not a win.
Capacity released is the honest headline
The realistic benefit is senior attention returned to judgement.
The credible near-term value is removing collation and cross-checking from expert workload so that scarce judgement is applied where it actually matters.
Controlled sequence
From input to accountable outcome.
Each transfer preserves context, ownership and the human gate required before consequential action.
- 01Record the pre-assistance baseline
- 02Define the quality adjudication method
- 03Measure cycle time per decision
- 04Track rework and repeated correction
- 05Attribute deviation and delay cost
- 06Review against delivered outcomes
Design boundary
What the system will not pretend to be.
Credibility begins where automation stops and accountable professional judgment starts.
No asserted ROI percentage
PDICON does not publish savings figures or customer results that do not yet exist.
No self-scored quality
Assistance quality is adjudicated by qualified experts, not by the model that produced it.
No value without baseline
A pilot that skips baseline measurement cannot produce a defensible value claim.
Questions answered
Precise answers for technical evaluation.
Open a question to inspect the operating position, not a marketing promise.
01What return on investment should we expect?
No figure is published. The value model defines how benefit will be measured — cycle time, rework, deviation cost and released capacity — starting from a documented baseline.
02How is assistance quality judged?
On held-back historical cases adjudicated by qualified experts, so quality is never scored by the system that generated the output.
Get started
Start with one real decision.
Bring a workflow your team already repeats. We define the evidence, the approver and the outcome to measure, then instrument it end to end.
Talk to the team How engagements work
We are working with a small number of design partners across engineering and procurement workflows.