PDICONIntelligence
Contact

Time attached to decisions, not timesheets

Effort and Time Intelligence

Effort and Time Intelligence records how long real project decisions take by observing workflow events already produced by the work: document intake, comparison, review, correction and approval. It replaces recalled timesheet estimates with evidence tied to a specific decision.

Platform capability in design

At a glance

What each figure means
Source of truth
Workflow events

Derived from work, not manual entry

Attachment
Per decision

Effort binds to an episode, not a week

Cycle view
Intake to approval

Design target for the procurement pilot

Correction cost
Rework hours

Illustrative model until pilot data exists

Product tour

Effort Intelligence in an operating review

The view below is an illustrative layout, not customer data. Real dashboards are generated from a customer’s own declared workflow fields.

Workflow analytics Sample view
01Define the decision boundary
02Timestamp workflow events in sequence
03Reconstruct effort per episode
04Separate waiting time from working time
05Attribute delay to a named cause
Stage load Reviewed Exception
A sample layout. Figures are placeholders, not measured customer results.
Timesheets lose the reason

Recalled hours cannot explain why a decision was slow.

A weekly timesheet records that eight hours went to procurement. It cannot show that six of them went to reconciling one vendor deviation against an outdated specification revision.

Events already exist

The work itself produces the timing evidence.

Document intake, comparison runs, review requests, corrections and approvals are already discrete events. Reading them in order reconstructs effort without asking anyone to log it.

Cycle time becomes actionable

Effort attached to a decision can be improved.

When elapsed time is bound to a specific evaluation, the delay can be traced to a missing document, an unavailable approver or an ambiguous requirement.

Operating matrix

Evidence moves through explicit controls.

The matrix separates source evidence, intelligence work, governing authority and the resulting artifact.

Control surface Reviewable lineage
SubjectInputIntelligence operationHuman / policy controlOutput
Working timeActive workflow eventsSequence and totalAggregate reportingEffort per decision
Waiting timeGaps between eventsClassify blocking reasonHuman confirmationDelay cause
Rework effortCorrection cyclesCount and totalManager reviewAvoidable-cost evidence
Cycle timeIntake to approvalCompare across episodesExplained by ownerPlanning benchmark

Controlled sequence

From input to accountable outcome.

Each transfer preserves context, ownership and the human gate required before consequential action.

  1. 01
    Define the decision boundary
  2. 02
    Timestamp workflow events in sequence
  3. 03
    Reconstruct effort per episode
  4. 04
    Separate waiting time from working time
  5. 05
    Attribute delay to a named cause
  6. 06
    Feed cycle evidence to planning

Design boundary

What the system will not pretend to be.

Credibility begins where automation stops and accountable professional judgment starts.

01

Not idle-time policing

The purpose is to explain decision cycle time, not to score attendance or activity.

02

Not a billing system

Effort evidence may inform commercial discussion, but the platform is not an invoicing tool.

03

Not validated timing

Cycle-time figures become real only after the first instrumented pilot.

Questions answered

Precise answers for technical evaluation.

Open a question to inspect the operating position, not a marketing promise.

01Does anyone need to fill in a timesheet?

No. Effort is reconstructed from workflow events the work already produces, which is why it can be attached to a specific decision.

02Why separate waiting time from working time?

Most procurement delay is waiting: for a document, a clarification or an approver. Separating them shows whether the fix is capacity or process.

Get started

Start with one real decision.

Bring a workflow your team already repeats. We define the evidence, the approver and the outcome to measure, then instrument it end to end.

Talk to the team How engagements work

We are working with a small number of design partners across engineering and procurement workflows.